The Hindustan Times on the front page carried the story of fresh FIRs being filed in the Ruchika Girhotra’s case. The second headline read: 19 Years later charges say Rathore hid evidence, tormented girl’s brother.

It’s not that CBI has had a change of heart or unearthed new evidence or been provided new facts to base its case against Rathore. So what’s changed in the last few weeks after the court pronounced a minor fine and a six month jail term for a person who had tormented a girl to commit suicide and drove her family away from their home in Panchkula.

The answer is in the third part of the same HT story in the box titled “When Public Pressure Worked”. It goes to list the cases of Jessica Lall, Nitish Katara and Priyadarshini Mattoo, who were initially denied justice as the culprits had political clout, money and power to subvert the judicial system. However, the public pressure that was Click to Read More

Share/Save as a bookmark

The last I heard a phrase like “Sorry, Indians not allowed” was in the pre-independence India and it’s a kind of strange that even more than 60 years after independence that in the Capital City of India, an international company which is looking to make money from India would open their FIRST outlet with an “Exclusive Preview for international travellers” and restrict access to holders of international passports..don’t believe me check out the picture that my friend and colleague Shrey Khetarpal took when he visited their outlet at the CITY SELECT MALL in Saket, New Delhi.

What’s their message “INDIANS KEEP OUT”! Wonder how’s that going to be possible for a retail outlet in India? Apparently, this is a franchise outlet and the franchisee is an Indian national. The question I ask, “Does Haagen-Dazs have any control over its communication and the way it presents itself to its consumers?” If the answer in this case is a NO, then it’s their Click to Read More

Share/Save as a bookmark